Search for: All records

A coupled path-planning and sensor configuration method is proposed. The path-planning objective is to minimize exposure to an unknown, spatially-varying, and temporally static scalar field called the threat field. The threat field is modeled as a weighted sum of several scalar fields, each representing a mode of threat. A heterogeneous sensor network takes noisy measurements of the threat field. Each sensor in the network observes one or more threat modes within a circular field of view (FoV). The sensors are configurable, i.e., parameters such as location and size of field of view can be changed. The measurement noise is assumed to be normally distributed with zero mean and a variance that monotonically increases with the size of the FoV, emulating the FoV v/s resolution trade-off in most sensors. Gaussian Process regression is used to estimate the threat field from these measurements. The main innovation of this work is that sensor configuration is performed by maximizing a so-called task-driven information gain (TDIG) metric, which quantifies uncertainty reduction in the cost of the planned path. Because the TDIG does not have any convenient structural properties, a surrogate function called the self-adaptive mutual information (SAMI) is considered. Sensor configuration based on the TDIG or SAMI introduces coupling with path-planning in accordance with the dynamic data-driven application systems paradigm. The benefit of this approach is that near-optimal plans are found with a relatively small number of measurements. In comparison to decoupled path-planning and sensor configuration based on traditional information-driven metrics, the proposed CSCP method results in near-optimal plans with fewer measurements. 

Sensor fusion combines data from a suite of sensors into an integrated solution that represents the target environment more accurately than that produced by individual sensors. New developments in Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are leading to increased accuracy, precision, and reliability in sensor fusion performance. However, these increases are accompanied by increases in system costs. Aircraft sensor systems have limited computing, storage, and bandwidth resources, which must balance monetary, computational, and throughput costs, sensor fusion performance, aircraft safety, data security, robustness, and modularity system objectives while meeting strict timing requirements. Performing trade studies of these system objectives should come before incorporating new ML models into the sensor fusion software. A scalable and automated solution is needed to quickly analyze the effects on the system’s objectives of providing additional resources to the new inference models. Given that model-based systems engineering (MBSE) is a focus of the majority of the aerospace industry for designing aircraft mission systems, it follows that leveraging these system models can provide scalability to the system analyses needed. This paper proposes adding empirically derived sensor fusion RNN performance and cost measurement data to machine-readable Model Cards. Furthermore, this paper proposes a scalable and automated sensor fusion system analysis process for ingesting SysML system model information and RNN Model Cards for system analyses. The value of this process is the integration of data analysis and system design that enables rapid enhancements of sensor system development.